<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Official Media Guide to Attacking Ron Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/</link>
	<description>For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uncovered: Official Media Guide to supporting John McCain :: Liberty Maven</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncovered: Official Media Guide to supporting John McCain :: Liberty Maven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] year Liberty Maven uncovered the not so shocking Official Media Guide to Attacking Ron Paul. Now we have uncovered another document written by the &#8220;Main Stream Media Czar&#8221; that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year Liberty Maven uncovered the not so shocking Official Media Guide to Attacking Ron Paul. Now we have uncovered another document written by the &#8220;Main Stream Media Czar&#8221; that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Incredible Electable Ron Paul :: Liberty Maven</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>The Incredible Electable Ron Paul :: Liberty Maven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve heard so many variations of &#8220;longshot&#8221; it has me almost believing &#8220;the man behind the curtain&#8221; exists controlling the media coverage in favor of the preferred candidates. In fact, I&#8217;ve written a satire piece on that very subject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve heard so many variations of &#8220;longshot&#8221; it has me almost believing &#8220;the man behind the curtain&#8221; exists controlling the media coverage in favor of the preferred candidates. In fact, I&#8217;ve written a satire piece on that very subject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABC &#38; Fox News Channel Cut Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter From Debates - Page 4 - Political Forum - US &#38; World Political Discussion Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC &#38; Fox News Channel Cut Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter From Debates - Page 4 - Political Forum - US &#38; World Political Discussion Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] go out of their way to call him a longshot or a F***ing *****bag because it's the best they got.  This is a funny article that sums it up    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] go out of their way to call him a longshot or a F***ing *****bag because it&#8217;s the best they got.  This is a funny article that sums it up    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mainstream Media&#8217;s Governance Policy with regard to Ron Paul &#171; Gilligan&#8217;s Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Mainstream Media&#8217;s Governance Policy with regard to Ron Paul &#171; Gilligan&#8217;s Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] December 23, 2007 &#183; 6 Comments  Ed&#8217;s Note: The original unmodified article appears here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December 23, 2007 &middot; 6 Comments  Ed&#8217;s Note: The original unmodified article appears here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Update...

It seems there is some confusion about whether this letter is "real" or if it is satire, which seems odd to me. 

To answer this question...

It was written by me, as satire. Most people got that, but I thought I'd post here to make sure the rest get it as well.

Enjoy,
Marc Gallagher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update&#8230;</p>
<p>It seems there is some confusion about whether this letter is &#8220;real&#8221; or if it is satire, which seems odd to me. </p>
<p>To answer this question&#8230;</p>
<p>It was written by me, as satire. Most people got that, but I thought I&#8217;d post here to make sure the rest get it as well.</p>
<p>Enjoy,<br />
Marc Gallagher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Members of the mainstream media in good standing should also be sure to mention Ron Paul's monetary policy proposals.  In doing so, always attach words such as "disastrous" or "insane."  Don't worry if you, personally, have no understanding of economics or monetary policy.  It is the smear that counts.  Your own ignorance will remain well-hidden by the equal lack of education on these topics by most of the general public.  

Do not under any circumstances ask Alan Greenspan about the gold standard!!!  While he is one of us, an establishment man with great credentials as chiarman of the Federal Reserve practically forever, he is prone to slipping up and acknowledging that gold defends freedom and that fiat currency is really a way to expand the size and scope of government.  The following link is for the eyes of mainstream media members ONLY, not for the general public, which might be enlightened.  DO NOT SHARE THIS WITH ANYONE!

http://www.constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.htm

Remember, "Ron Paul" equals "kooky" and "unelectable."  Anything less and we are simply not doing our job!  Keep up the good work fellow media drones!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Members of the mainstream media in good standing should also be sure to mention Ron Paul&#8217;s monetary policy proposals.  In doing so, always attach words such as &#8220;disastrous&#8221; or &#8220;insane.&#8221;  Don&#8217;t worry if you, personally, have no understanding of economics or monetary policy.  It is the smear that counts.  Your own ignorance will remain well-hidden by the equal lack of education on these topics by most of the general public.  </p>
<p>Do not under any circumstances ask Alan Greenspan about the gold standard!!!  While he is one of us, an establishment man with great credentials as chiarman of the Federal Reserve practically forever, he is prone to slipping up and acknowledging that gold defends freedom and that fiat currency is really a way to expand the size and scope of government.  The following link is for the eyes of mainstream media members ONLY, not for the general public, which might be enlightened.  DO NOT SHARE THIS WITH ANYONE!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.htm</a></p>
<p>Remember, &#8220;Ron Paul&#8221; equals &#8220;kooky&#8221; and &#8220;unelectable.&#8221;  Anything less and we are simply not doing our job!  Keep up the good work fellow media drones!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aynrkey</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>aynrkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 07:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Also:

Refer to Giuliani as the libertarian candidate, this time using the word "libertarian" in a positive way.

Send out a nutjob named Dondero to make the case that Authoritarianism is actually Libertarianism in the case of Giuliani.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also:</p>
<p>Refer to Giuliani as the libertarian candidate, this time using the word &#8220;libertarian&#8221; in a positive way.</p>
<p>Send out a nutjob named Dondero to make the case that Authoritarianism is actually Libertarianism in the case of Giuliani.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunner</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>gunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Byline 4.5.a.72b:

If you consider yourself a balanced host, or if you think it would be too obvious to wield the hatchet yourself, make sure to stock your show with the smarmiest, most self entitled frattards possible to do the dirty work for you. See the following example for advice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBevBb7aZJw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byline 4.5.a.72b:</p>
<p>If you consider yourself a balanced host, or if you think it would be too obvious to wield the hatchet yourself, make sure to stock your show with the smarmiest, most self entitled frattards possible to do the dirty work for you. See the following example for advice: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBevBb7aZJw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBevBb7aZJw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoMar</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>BoMar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 04:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Laugh when Ron Paul's name is mentioned. Try to make your laughing seem natural, showing as many teeth as possible, even if it looks like you are snarling at the audience. If your laughing still comes across as a bit nervous and unnatural - which it always will - snap back with the ready phrase: "But realistically..." The phrase means nothing, but that's exactly the point: In situations like this one meaningful phrases are dangerous and cause a lot of harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laugh when Ron Paul&#8217;s name is mentioned. Try to make your laughing seem natural, showing as many teeth as possible, even if it looks like you are snarling at the audience. If your laughing still comes across as a bit nervous and unnatural - which it always will - snap back with the ready phrase: &#8220;But realistically&#8230;&#8221; The phrase means nothing, but that&#8217;s exactly the point: In situations like this one meaningful phrases are dangerous and cause a lot of harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvorsky</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>tvorsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Also, as an addendum to Section 7 of the Official Guide. 

While using our considerable information-gathering muscle to uncover all the pimps and jaywalkers who have donated to this campaign is laudible, it is more effective while making sure not to mention that candidate Paul's record breaking money comes from ordinary people of limited means, many of whom have never been political before, and not from special interests and political action committees.
It is interesting, but someone noted that fortunately candidate Paul has not made much of this fact either. Sure, he talks about how many new contributors they're getting and how its swelling, but he usually doesn't drive the point home and put a human face on it. And that's dangerous because the human face he puts on it is the one in the mirror -- not the folksy, laconic, apple-pie, patriotic ones We and K Street have crafted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, as an addendum to Section 7 of the Official Guide. </p>
<p>While using our considerable information-gathering muscle to uncover all the pimps and jaywalkers who have donated to this campaign is laudible, it is more effective while making sure not to mention that candidate Paul&#8217;s record breaking money comes from ordinary people of limited means, many of whom have never been political before, and not from special interests and political action committees.<br />
It is interesting, but someone noted that fortunately candidate Paul has not made much of this fact either. Sure, he talks about how many new contributors they&#8217;re getting and how its swelling, but he usually doesn&#8217;t drive the point home and put a human face on it. And that&#8217;s dangerous because the human face he puts on it is the one in the mirror &#8212; not the folksy, laconic, apple-pie, patriotic ones We and K Street have crafted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvorsky</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>tvorsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>You forgot another one. 
THE R WORD. 
Unfortunately, because one of candidate Paul's unsupervised, independent-minded and, sadly prophetic, supporters has deemed this campaign a Revolution (wince) you may have to use that word when refering to candidate Paul. It should be used with extreme caution and avoided if at all possible. Using it with derision is dangerous because it can stir sympathy in the simple minds of the impressionable fools that follow candidate Paul, tempering his control over them. Repeated analyisis of past interviews shows that it is most effective when used in as bland and monotone way possible and move on.
While words are important, even more important are graphic images in our multi media-video driven-reality (obscenly-hyphenated) world of today. Under no circumstances is one to provide video images of the incredible crowds he has been drawing, all with little or no advance work other than saying he'd be at such and such a place at such in such a time to talk. This was never more masterfully executed then last autumn the MSM ran a story about how hard it was for candidates to get big crowds at their appearances, ones that look impressive on tv. It was noted that even when the campaign bused them in at the campaign's expense that the "frontrunners" could only muster 150 or so. Nowhere was it mentioned that the day before thousands had shown up to hear candidate Paul speak in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ditto with the one at Independence Hall.
Of all the places! 
The Nerve!
Video images of otherwise normal-looking people, taking time off from busy lives, on their own dime, gathering in huge crowds, without being prodded to do so by anything but their conscience, when used in conjunction with words like Revolution can be a dangerous thing. People should gather when WE tell them to. And not otherwise. What is this gathering of one's own accord? 
It makes the bosses uneasy.  

Images of two or three supporters standing on a street corner in Butte, Montana holding Paul signs in a snow storm is acceptible, so long as Section 2 of the Official Media Guide is adhered to.  "Crazy people hold signs on street corners don't they? Now back to you in the studio, Jim."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot another one.<br />
THE R WORD.<br />
Unfortunately, because one of candidate Paul&#8217;s unsupervised, independent-minded and, sadly prophetic, supporters has deemed this campaign a Revolution (wince) you may have to use that word when refering to candidate Paul. It should be used with extreme caution and avoided if at all possible. Using it with derision is dangerous because it can stir sympathy in the simple minds of the impressionable fools that follow candidate Paul, tempering his control over them. Repeated analyisis of past interviews shows that it is most effective when used in as bland and monotone way possible and move on.<br />
While words are important, even more important are graphic images in our multi media-video driven-reality (obscenly-hyphenated) world of today. Under no circumstances is one to provide video images of the incredible crowds he has been drawing, all with little or no advance work other than saying he&#8217;d be at such and such a place at such in such a time to talk. This was never more masterfully executed then last autumn the MSM ran a story about how hard it was for candidates to get big crowds at their appearances, ones that look impressive on tv. It was noted that even when the campaign bused them in at the campaign&#8217;s expense that the &#8220;frontrunners&#8221; could only muster 150 or so. Nowhere was it mentioned that the day before thousands had shown up to hear candidate Paul speak in Ann Arbor, Michigan.<br />
Ditto with the one at Independence Hall.<br />
Of all the places!<br />
The Nerve!<br />
Video images of otherwise normal-looking people, taking time off from busy lives, on their own dime, gathering in huge crowds, without being prodded to do so by anything but their conscience, when used in conjunction with words like Revolution can be a dangerous thing. People should gather when WE tell them to. And not otherwise. What is this gathering of one&#8217;s own accord?<br />
It makes the bosses uneasy.  </p>
<p>Images of two or three supporters standing on a street corner in Butte, Montana holding Paul signs in a snow storm is acceptible, so long as Section 2 of the Official Media Guide is adhered to.  &#8220;Crazy people hold signs on street corners don&#8217;t they? Now back to you in the studio, Jim.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bostonian2008</title>
		<link>http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>bostonian2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>You forgot one.
Make sure to always mention that there are FIVE "leading candidates" in the GOP race, no matter how pathetic any one of those five are doing in the polls or in terms of fundraising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot one.<br />
Make sure to always mention that there are FIVE &#8220;leading candidates&#8221; in the GOP race, no matter how pathetic any one of those five are doing in the polls or in terms of fundraising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
